QVCS Enterprise 2.1.24 Update Server Issue
#1
Posted 07 December 2011 - 12:33 PM
We updated our server to QVCS Enterprise 2.1.24 and the server.bat runs and closes? Running as a services it says it is running but the clients all report "Server is down, or not available at: %IP Address:9889".
Our previous version: 2.1.23
Java: 1.6.0_20
Network Setup: Domain / clients
We replaced the following files:
- server_out.jar
- installEnterpriseService.bat
- test_enterprise_install.bat
- test_enterprise_uninstall.bat
Once we seen this issue, we restore the main directory back to previous version (backup made before the update). And it does the same thing!
I really need some help on this! Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Terry Mullican
Tire Power Project Leader
Tire Company Solutions, LLC
www.tcstirepower.com
Tire Company Solution, LLC
www.tcstire.com
#2
Posted 07 December 2011 - 12:49 PM
Jim,
We updated our server to QVCS Enterprise 2.1.24 and the server.bat runs and closes? Running as a services it says it is running but the clients all report "Server is down, or not available at: %IP Address:9889".
Our previous version: 2.1.23
Java: 1.6.0_20
Network Setup: Domain / clients
We replaced the following files:
- server_out.jar
- installEnterpriseService.bat
- test_enterprise_install.bat
- test_enterprise_uninstall.bat
Once we seen this issue, we restore the main directory back to previous version (backup made before the update). And it does the same thing!
I really need some help on this! Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Terry Mullican
Tire Power Project Leader
Tire Company Solutions, LLC
www.tcstirepower.com
Tire Company Solution, LLC
www.tcstire.com
#3
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:39 AM
Also, see that blog entry for how to change the connection settings on the client so that it can connect to the 2.1.24 server. Once the 2.1.23 client is able to connect to the 2.1.24 server, it should get 'automatically' updated to the 2.1.24 client.
Affordable Version Control Solutions
www.qumasoft.com
#4
Posted 15 December 2011 - 03:46 PM
As Oracle has delivered a version 1.6.0_30 wich fix the regression they made on SSL connections in 1.6.0_29, is there stil a reason for the new 2.1.24 not to accept anonymous SSL connections ?
I hope this sentences is "English understandable"...
In other words :
I am running the version 2.1.23
I've installed the 1.6.0_30 and for the moment, everythings seems fine. (without the hack described in your blog)
I don't really want to install the version 2.1.24 if it's not encrypted anymore and if I have to make a VPN
Thank you
#5
Posted 16 December 2011 - 06:37 PM
If you are really concerned about security, then anonymous SSL doesn't really work, because it is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.
If your security concerns can be satisfied by anonymous SSL, then you'll be just as safe with no encryption, since the bulk of the traffic is not clear text per se -- it is compressed clear text. It wouldn't be that hard to figure it out, but it would mean the 'bad guy' is willing to go to some effort, which also means they would likely have the resources also to do the man-in-the-middle attack as well... so anonymous SSL doesn't really do anything except supply a false sense of security.
If you want or need a secure connection, you really need to use a VPN.
Affordable Version Control Solutions
www.qumasoft.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











